Dr. Mostaque Sattar 🇧🇩
(BDS, DDS, MCPS, FICCDE, FICD)
Education
BDS Bachelor of Dental Surgery – Dhaka Dental College under university of Dhaka – 1983
DDS Diploma in Dental Surgery – IPGMR under university of Dhaka, 1989-90
MCPS – Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, Mohakhali, Dhaka-Bangladesh – 1990
Dr. Mostaque H Sattar is a renown Creative Smile Designer and he knows the impact of a smile can have on someone’s life and self-confidence, brings his talents and experience with cosmetic dentistry from his early time of teaching and maintains a state-of-the-art practice. Dr. Sattar is specialty-trained in the full range of dentistry options specially orthodontics and cosmetic, and has helped create some of the most recognizable smiles in the world. Known throughout country as a dentist to the stars, he has the dental skills and artistic ability to give a movie-star smile too.
Dr. Sattar was the president of South Asian Academy of Aesthetic Dentistry and a Vice President of the Asian Academy of Aesthetic Dentistry, Vice President of Bangladesh Dental Society, Vice President, Bangladesh Orthodontic Society and other major dental organizations. He is now in Editorial Board of MICD Journal is a peer-reviewed online international journal and cosmetic dentistry _ beauty & science Published by Dental Tribune. He focuses on providing comprehensive minimal invasive or noninvasive dental care using safe techniques that have proven effective.
He was former Regent of International College Dentistry, Member of Rotary Club of Dhaka Mahanagor.
Attended more than 100 seminar, symposium, conference and workshop including 31 abroad at USA, Russia, UK, Australia, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, China, Hong Kong, Korea, Thailand, India, Pakistan, Nepal and Srilanka etc.
Awards, Fellowships, Grants
- Glaxo Smithkline GSK Bangladesh award of BD Tk.100,000.00 (Taka One Hundred Thousand only) to publish a Book Chair Side FAQ, Dental and Oral Health Education Book, 1st Edn. 2006 ISBN 984-32-3322-0
- Honorary Fellowship of South Asian Academy of Aesthetic dentistry 2011, Bangalore, India
Social and Organizational Background 1984-2014
- Vice President, Bangladesh dental Society (National organization) 2013 – 15 and 2015 – 17.
- President, South Asian Academy of Aesthetic Dentistry 2013 – 2015.
- Vice President, Asian Academy of Aesthetic Dentistry 2023 – present.
- Vice president, Asian Academy of Aesthetic Dentistry 2020 – 24.
- President, Bangladesh Academy of Aesthetic and Cosmetic Dentistry 2010 – 2019.
- Representative of Bangladesh, foundation conference at San Francisco USA, World Federation of Orthodontics 401 N. Lindbergh Blvd St. Louis, MO 63141-7816 USA phone #: 314/993-1700 fax #: 314/993 – 6992.
- Joint Secretary, Bangladesh Orthodontic Society 1998 – 2016.
- Vice President Feni Samity, Dhaka 2005 – 2007.
- Executive Editor, Bangladesh Dental Journal, 1991 – 94.
- Member Editorial Board, Bangladesh Dental Journal, 1994 – 99.
- Member Editorial Board, Journal of Oral Health, 1996 – 99.
- Editor of Publications, International Dental Seminar, 1994.
- Member Secretary, Scientific Sessions, South Asian Dental Associations Federation Conference Organizing Committee, 1995.
Lecture : Implants in the Aesthetic Zone: Predictability & Pitfalls
(Day 3) 23rd November 2025 : 4:30 PM – 5:00 PM
Esthetics signifies “natural beauty”, a quality that comes from within. It can be defined as the science of beauty that is applied in nature and in art. Ever since implants have been used as a treatment option for replacement of missing natural teeth, its results have found to be successful both in term of stability and esthetic outcomes. However, when tooth loss is accompanied by soft tissue and bone loss, it often requires augmentation of the peri-implant soft tissue or bony site either before or after the placement of the implant. This forms the crux of peri-implant plastic surgery. Peri-implant plastic surgery focuses on harmonizing peri-implant structures by means of hard tissue engineering and soft tissue engineering.
Aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth with implant supported restorations is one of the most difficult procedures to execute. Bone resorption following anterior tooth extraction often compromises gingival tissue levels for the implant restoration. In the last 10 years the focus has shifted from osseointegration, to creation of an implant borne restoration which is in harmony with the surrounding hard and soft tissue. Complete reconstruction of tooth and gingival related aesthetics remains the primary objective and in some instances can be very difficult to achieve.
Today clinicians can prescribe the use of implants with the knowledge and confidence that they will predictably integrate into the jaw bone. The successful integration of an implant, however, is not sufficient to declare success; implants placed in poor restorative positions result in unaesthetic restorations that provide little satisfaction for the clinician or the patient. The complexity of implant use in aesthetic zones and the importance of proper treatment planning prior to implant placement. During prosthesis it can be managed to some extend
Implant placement in the anterior region is one of the most challenging surgical procedures in terms of esthetic outcome and patient’s awareness of this sensitive region. Careful clinical evaluation prior to implant surgery in terms of hard and soft tissue. Implant supported single crowns have the highest estimated 10-year survival rate (89.4%) compared to conventional FDP (89.2%), cantilever FDP (80.3%), implant-supported FDP (86.7%), combined tooth-implant-supported FDP (77.8%) and resin-bonded bridges (65%) (Pjetursson et al. 2008).
The angulation of the implant axis partly determines the facial emergence profile of the final crown. The implant body should be positioned according to the facial position of the crown of the adjacent teeth, directly under the incisal edge or under the cingulum. The latter often allows screw-retained crowns as the screw access hole is situated within the cingulum. Too facial positioning may result in the use of cement-retained crowns or angled abutment screws. The best esthetic outcome is accomplished by positioning the implant body under the incisal edge.
Another important factor, which influences the emergence profile, is the depth of the implant body. Shallow positioning of less than 2mm below the free gingival margin (FGM) could lead to visible parts of the titanium screw. Deep positioning of more than 4mm below the cementoenamel junction could result in greater probing depths, which is possibly linked to bone loss. The ideal depth is situated between 2 and 4mm below the FGM of the adjacent teeth (Nisapakultorn et al. 2010).
In order to gain a sufficient amount of bone on the facial site (at least 1.5mm or more) and to direct the implant axis through the incisal edge of the final crown a slightly palatal positioning of the implant is necessary. Implant insertion depth, palatal wall, bucall plate, gap considerations, mesio distal distance to adjacent teeth .
